Latest Blogs
-
Tilley: Pensions Commission must push reform...and quickly
Recent news of the revival of a Pensions Commission was music to my ears.
-
Lisa Webster: Till pensions do us part
There have been some fluctuations in recent years but overall divorce rates in the UK have been in decline since the 1990s.
-
Tilley: Let’s end the SIPP vs SSAS debate for good
As you might know from my previous columns on SIPPs Professional, I am, and have been for some time, a huge advocate for Small Self-Administered Schemes (SSAS).
-
Lisa Webster: Pre-Budget withdrawals are spiking again
Ever since “tax-free cash” changed its official name to “pension commencement lump sum” back in 2006 there have been pre-Budget rumours that it was going to change – and not for the better.
Popular News
-
SIPP market tops 6m plans but may be peaking - study
The SIPP market has grown strongly in the past year with a record 6m+ SIPPs in force and £650bn invested, according to MoretoSIPPs, the specialist consultancy headed by SIPP industry veteran John Moret.
-
Nest abandoned by 10m workers
Less than a third of members of the Nest Pension scheme are paying into their retirement pots, according to new data released under an FOI request.
-
AMPS reappoints Debbie Seaton as chair
The Association of Member-Directed Pension Schemes (AMPS), a trade body for SIPP and SSAS providers, has reappointed Debbie Seaton of Seabridge SSAS as its chair.
Headline News
Latest News
A new policy paper from Royal London predicts ‘safety first’ policies on pensions in the manifestos of the major political parties.
The paper, published yesterday, summarised the pension policies of the parties as set out in their 2017 manifestos and reviewed the major changes in the world of state and private pensions since then.
It then looked at the major areas of pension policy such as the ‘Triple Lock’ on the state pension, state pension ages, pension tax relief and automatic enrolment and flags the key areas to look out for when the manifestos are published.
The paper argued that:
• The 2017 Conservative manifesto was written at a time when the Conservatives expected a comfortable victory and included a higher proportion of ‘tough choices’ than would be normal; these included abolishing the ‘triple lock’ on state pension increases and implementing the means-testing of winter fuel payments; the paper argues that it will be a key indicator of the Conservatives’ electoral confidence whether these tough policies are retained or dropped;
• Worsening figures on life expectancy improvements since 2017 make it more likely that Labour and the SNP will strengthen their opposition to state pension age increases; the Conservatives are likely to simply restate their intention to hold another five-yearly review before any further changes are announced;
Pension Tax relief was not mentioned in either the Labour or Conservative manifestos in 2017 and Royal London says radical reform of the whole system is unlikely to be a feature of the 2019 manifestos, as parties look to avoid upsetting key voter groups.
It says there are areas where parties may focus, however.
These include tackling the ‘tapered annual allowance’ which the firm says “seems to have contributed to NHS doctors and consultants cutting their working hours in the face of large and unexpected tax bills”.
Royal London says the Treasury “eventually agreed to undertake a review into the impact of the ‘taper’ and the Conservative manifesto could reflect the conclusions of that review”.
The firm also says the Liberal Democrats have proposed a more radical reform agenda for pension tax relief, but said it was “unclear if controversial proposals to limit tax free lump sums and introduce ‘flat rate’ tax relief will make it from the conference floor to the manifesto”.
Royal London believes annual uprating of UK pensions for people living in the EU after Brexit could be an Election issue and says the Government has so far “only guaranteed uprating for three years, to 2023”.
Labour has in the past promised that all UK pensions will be uprated anywhere in the world and is likely to make a firm manifesto commitment to include those living in the EU.
The firm says the 2017 manifestos “had little to say about the role of pension funds in tackling climate change and other environmental issues”, which is “likely to be a much stronger theme in the 2019 manifestos, with the Labour party in particular likely to propose much tougher regulations”.
Steve Webb, director of policy at Royal London, said: “With the election outcome highly uncertain, we are likely to see a ‘safety first’ approach to pension policy with few ideas for radical reform.
“The 2017 Conservative manifesto did contain tough measures such as scrapping the triple lock and means-testing winter fuel payments.
“Whether or not these are repeated in 2019 will be a key indicator of the Conservatives’ electoral confidence.
“Recent data on how long we are all living is likely to lead to stronger opposition to rapid state pension age increases, and the opposition parties are likely to repeat pledges to support women affected by rapid state pension age increases.
“Areas in need of systematic reform such as pension tax relief are unlikely to be debated in any depth during the election campaign and any proposals are likely to be announced when the campaign is over rather than before votes are cast.”
The paper, published yesterday, summarised the pension policies of the parties as set out in their 2017 manifestos and reviewed the major changes in the world of state and private pensions since then.
It then looked at the major areas of pension policy such as the ‘Triple Lock’ on the state pension, state pension ages, pension tax relief and automatic enrolment and flags the key areas to look out for when the manifestos are published.
The paper argued that:
• The 2017 Conservative manifesto was written at a time when the Conservatives expected a comfortable victory and included a higher proportion of ‘tough choices’ than would be normal; these included abolishing the ‘triple lock’ on state pension increases and implementing the means-testing of winter fuel payments; the paper argues that it will be a key indicator of the Conservatives’ electoral confidence whether these tough policies are retained or dropped;
• Worsening figures on life expectancy improvements since 2017 make it more likely that Labour and the SNP will strengthen their opposition to state pension age increases; the Conservatives are likely to simply restate their intention to hold another five-yearly review before any further changes are announced;
Pension Tax relief was not mentioned in either the Labour or Conservative manifestos in 2017 and Royal London says radical reform of the whole system is unlikely to be a feature of the 2019 manifestos, as parties look to avoid upsetting key voter groups.
It says there are areas where parties may focus, however.
These include tackling the ‘tapered annual allowance’ which the firm says “seems to have contributed to NHS doctors and consultants cutting their working hours in the face of large and unexpected tax bills”.
Royal London says the Treasury “eventually agreed to undertake a review into the impact of the ‘taper’ and the Conservative manifesto could reflect the conclusions of that review”.
The firm also says the Liberal Democrats have proposed a more radical reform agenda for pension tax relief, but said it was “unclear if controversial proposals to limit tax free lump sums and introduce ‘flat rate’ tax relief will make it from the conference floor to the manifesto”.
Royal London believes annual uprating of UK pensions for people living in the EU after Brexit could be an Election issue and says the Government has so far “only guaranteed uprating for three years, to 2023”.
Labour has in the past promised that all UK pensions will be uprated anywhere in the world and is likely to make a firm manifesto commitment to include those living in the EU.
The firm says the 2017 manifestos “had little to say about the role of pension funds in tackling climate change and other environmental issues”, which is “likely to be a much stronger theme in the 2019 manifestos, with the Labour party in particular likely to propose much tougher regulations”.
Steve Webb, director of policy at Royal London, said: “With the election outcome highly uncertain, we are likely to see a ‘safety first’ approach to pension policy with few ideas for radical reform.
“The 2017 Conservative manifesto did contain tough measures such as scrapping the triple lock and means-testing winter fuel payments.
“Whether or not these are repeated in 2019 will be a key indicator of the Conservatives’ electoral confidence.
“Recent data on how long we are all living is likely to lead to stronger opposition to rapid state pension age increases, and the opposition parties are likely to repeat pledges to support women affected by rapid state pension age increases.
“Areas in need of systematic reform such as pension tax relief are unlikely to be debated in any depth during the election campaign and any proposals are likely to be announced when the campaign is over rather than before votes are cast.”
Over half of technical queries received by SIPP operator Curtis Banks over the past month have concerned the subject of death benefits.
Two rival platform 'engine' providers - who run many UK platforms including AJ Bell - have joined forces following a takeover deal.
Mercer has unveiled Mercer Money, a personal finance and ‘financial wellness’ platform allowing a company’s employees to manage their pensions and personal finances in one place.
Digital advice firm OpenMoney - which combines online and human advice - has acquired Jargonfree Benefits (JFB), the employee benefits business set up by pensions guru and cartoonist Steve Bee.
Almost 1 in 2 UK adults (48%) shun financial advisers when it comes to retirement planning advice despite evidence suggesting advised clients were far better financially prepared for retirement.