James Jones-Tinsley: Sipp rule aims may be lost in translation
The much-anticipated capital adequacy regime for SIPPs is finally upon us, and providers now have to get out their abacuses, and remove their shoes and socks, in order to undertake the calculations that will determine the requisite size of their capital reserves, underpinning the membership of their SIPP book of business and portfolio of assets.
Read 3315 times
Last modified on Tuesday, 30 August 2016 12:47
Published in
Comment and Blogs
Tagged under
Related items
More in this category:
« MacGillivray: FCA alert comes after horse has bolted
Morrison: End of era for Sipps world perhaps not a bad thing »
News from Twitter
Articles by Keyword
AJ Bell
AMPS
annuities
Autoenrolment
Barnett Waddingham
Curtis Banks
DWP
FCA
FOS
FSCS
James Hay
Lisa Webster
Mattioli Woods
Pension
pension freedoms
pensions
pension transfers
Platforms
regulation
retirement
retirement planning
Sipp
Sipps
Ssas
Talbot and Muir
The Pensions Regulator
TPR
Webster
websterblog
Xafinity